Normative economics is an approach that reflects prescriptive judgments toward economic scenarios. This school of thought emphasizes value judgments rather than facts based on cause-and-effect.
When the government enacts public policy changes, normative economics suggests what may result merely based on judgments. It’s not possible to verify or test normative economics due to its opinion-focused analysis.
Investment professionals use investment portfolio management software to build, track, and manage investments in the economy. Investors may use a combination of normative and positive economics.
Normative economics is tied to Arthur Cecil Pigou’s The Economics of Welfare. In it, Pigou developed the concept of externalities. Following Pigou, the concept of new welfare economics emerged in the 1930s and is considered the second form of normative economics.
In new welfare economics, normative statements about policies and welfare were made using the Pareto Principle to achieve a state of Pareto efficiency.
Various subfields exist within normative economics. They include:
Normative statements contain value judgments and include verbiage such as “have to”, “ought to”, and “must.” Below are some examples of normative economics statements:
Normative and positive economics are two different schools of thought in modern economics. Normative economics emphasizes what the economy should look like based on prescriptive judgments and opinions. Positive economics refers to an objective analysis of economics that relies on facts and can be tested or proven with data.